Continue reading on DataGuidance with:
Free Member
Limited ArticlesCreate an account to continue accessing select articles, resources, and guidance notes.
Already have an account? Log in
Michigan: Bill to amend Identity Theft Protection Act introduced
Senate Bill ('SB') 0672 for a bill to amend Public Act 452 of 2004 for the Identity Theft Protection Act, was introduced, on 5 October 2021, in the Michigan State Senate. In particular, SB 0672 seeks to introduce certain affirmative defences via information security programs. In addition, SB 0672 notes that a covered entity is entitled to an affirmative defence to any tort cause of action that alleges that the covered entity's failure to implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a security breach if the covered entity demonstrates all of the following:
- the covered entity established, maintained, and reasonably complied with a written cybersecurity program that contains administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for the protection of personal information and personal identifying information that reasonably conforms to the current version of an industry-recognised cybersecurity framework or standard; and
- the covered entity's cybersecurity program is designed to do all of the following:
- protect the security and confidentiality of personal information and personal identifying information;
- protect against anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of personal information and personal identifying information; and
- protect against unauthorised access to and acquisition of personal information and personal identifying information that is likely to result in a material risk of identity theft to the individual to whom the personal information and personal identifying information relate.
Moreover, SB 0672 outlines that a cybersecurity program is appropriate if it is based on all of the following factors:
- the size and complexity of the covered entity;
- the nature and scope of the activities of the covered entity;
- the sensitivity of the information to be protected;
- the cost and availability of tools to improve information security and reduce vulnerabilities; and
- the resources available to the covered entity.
Furthermore, SB 0672 highlights that it does not provide a private right of action, including a class action, with respect to any act or practice under the Identity Theft Protection Act.